February 29th, 2016 IRC Meeting - Revision history

Jokeefe at 02:40, 2 February 2018

2018-02-02T02:40:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:40, 1 February 2018
Line 44:		Line 44:

	* jokeefe (James O’Keefe, Somerville)		* jokeefe (James O’Keefe, Somerville)
	* Bluestreak (Lucia Fiero~~, Medway~~)		* Bluestreak (Lucia Fiero)
	* srevilak (Steve Revilak, Arlington)		* srevilak (Steve Revilak, Arlington)
	* aquaticonions (Eli Haber, Lexington MA)		* aquaticonions (Eli Haber, Lexington MA)
Line 68:		Line 68:
	https://masspirates.org/wiki/February_29th,_2016_IRC_Meeting		https://masspirates.org/wiki/February_29th,_2016_IRC_Meeting
	21:03 < jokeefe> ids - James O’Keefe, Somerville		21:03 < jokeefe> ids - James O’Keefe, Somerville
	21:03 < Bluestreak> Lucia Fiero~~, Medway~~		21:03 < Bluestreak> Lucia Fiero
	21:03 < srevilak> Steve Revilak, Arlington, MA		21:03 < srevilak> Steve Revilak, Arlington, MA
	21:03 < aquaticonions> Eli Haber, Lexington MA		21:03 < aquaticonions> Eli Haber, Lexington MA

Srevilak: /* Minutes */

2016-03-01T02:54:44Z

Minutes

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:54, 29 February 2016
Line 65:		Line 65:

	<nowiki>		<nowiki>
			21:02 < jokeefe> agenda -
			https://masspirates.org/wiki/February_29th,_2016_IRC_Meeting
			21:03 < jokeefe> ids - James O’Keefe, Somerville
			21:03 < Bluestreak> Lucia Fiero, Medway
			21:03 < srevilak> Steve Revilak, Arlington, MA
			21:03 < aquaticonions> Eli Haber, Lexington MA
			21:04 <@igel> William Fleurant, Arlington MA
			21:04 <@Bluestreak> Hola igel
			21:04 <@igel> habla que tal :]
			21:05 <@igel> tuesday TuesDay TuESDAY!
			21:05 <@igel> be there there there there....
			21:05 <@jokeefe> Review & Decisions
			21:05 <@jokeefe> No Phone Backdoors Protest went will at least 30 people
			over the duration. Lots of press.
			21:06 <@jokeefe> posted thank you at
			https://masspirates.org/blog/2016/02/29/tuesdays-no-phone-backdoor-rally-was-a-success/
			21:06 <@jokeefe> some progress -
			http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/02/apple-prevails-in-forced-iphone-unlock-case-in-new-york-court/
			21:07 <@srevilak> That's encouraging
			21:07 <@Bluestreak> Channel seven reported that there was no more than
			“a baker’s dozen” at the Apple demo.
			21:07 <@Bluestreak> #msmlies
			21:08 <@jokeefe> yes, to be expected
			21:08 <@Bluestreak> This most recent ruling was about a drus case.
			21:09 <@Bluestreak> If they rule against Apple because: Terrorism,
			we all know that back doors will be used in drugs cases.
			21:10 <@jokeefe> and car crashes
			21:10 <@jokeefe> Discussion of Senate FOIA bill
			21:10 <@jokeefe> Marked up copy of the bill
			21:10 <@jokeefe>
			https://masspirates.org/wiki/2015_S.2120_An_Act_to_improve_public_records
			21:11 <@srevilak> Nice job
			21:12 <@srevilak> had a chance to read through S2120 last night.
			There is some good stuff in there
			21:12 <@jokeefe> is Bill S.2127 the same as S.2120?
			21:13 <@jokeefe> doesn’t look the same
			21:13 <@srevilak> This is a good question.
			21:13 <@srevilak> my printed copy definitely says 2120
			21:13 <@Bluestreak> GTG, sorry. Send you a PM jokeefe. See y’all soon
			I hope.
			21:14 <@srevilak> Let's see, we have
			https://malegislature.gov/Bills/189/Senate/S2120/History
			21:14 <@jokeefe> Bill history 2/4/2016 Senate Reprinted as amended,
			see S2127
			21:14 <@jokeefe> 2/4/2016 Senate Substituted as amended for H3858
			21:14 <@jokeefe> 2/4/2016 Senate See H3858
			21:14 <@srevilak> I see:
			https://malegislature.gov/Bills/189/Senate/S2127/History
			21:15 <@srevilak> S2127 is the amended version of S.2120
			21:16 <@srevilak> will have to read that one
			21:16 <@igel> yeh, im just searching for terms on it..
			21:18 <@jokeefe> updating
			https://masspirates.org/wiki/2015_S.2127_An_Act_to_improve_public_records
			21:20 <@jokeefe> they don’t make it easy to edit
			21:21 <@jokeefe> SECTION 3A. Said section 7 of said chapter 4, as so
			appearing, is hereby further amended by striking out, in line 231,
			and in line 242, the second time it appears, the word “home”.
			21:26 * srevilak thinks our legislators need the concept of `diff'
			21:26 <@jokeefe> yes.
			21:26 <@jokeefe> comments?
			21:27 <@srevilak> I need to spend some time with the new version.
			I'd also like to take a look at some of the individual amendments
			21:28 <@jokeefe> Yeah, there is much to this.
			21:28 <@igel> no comments, trying to read whatever i put in summerize
			21:28 <@jokeefe> push off to two weeks from now? srevilak, can you make
			that meeting?
			21:29 <@srevilak> I think the next BOS meeting will be the 7th, so 2
			weeks should be okay
			21:29 * srevilak checks arlington's public meeting calendar
			21:30 <@srevilak> yes, Have monday meeting on Mar 7th. Following week
			is okay
			21:31 <@jokeefe> igel, aquaticonions, does that work for you two?
			21:31 <@aquaticonions> checking now
			21:31 <@aquaticonions> depends on time for me. What time are we thinking?
			21:33 <@srevilak> usual monday time, 9pm -- no?
			21:33 <@jokeefe> yes
			21:33 <@aquaticonions> ok, just making sure. sounds fine to me
			21:34 <@igel> prob. not. but, will set a remdr.
			21:35 <@igel> unsure, but wiki so i'll beok heh.
			21:36 <@jokeefe> srevilak, does that work?
			21:36 <@jokeefe> time?
			21:37 <@srevilak> yes
			21:38 <@jokeefe> ok then
			21:38 <@jokeefe> PirateCon 2016
			21:39 <@jokeefe> survey was mailed out
			21:39 <@jokeefe> post goes up soon
			21:39 <@jokeefe> have list of candidates and volunteers to call
			21:40 <@jokeefe> as well as regional members
			21:40 <@srevilak> jokeefe: this evening, I added "Next Election" as one
			of the `survey' responses
			21:40 <@srevilak> (minor change)
			21:42 <@jokeefe> in Conference Topics?
			21:42 <@jokeefe> not seeing it
			21:42 <@srevilak> jokeefe: no - for "Do you want to run in 2016"
			phonebank survey
			21:43 <@srevilak> Sorry - was responding to "have list of candidates
			and volunteers to call"
			21:43 <@jokeefe> oh ok
			21:46 <@jokeefe> anything to add?
			21:46 <@srevilak> jokeefe: looking at piratecon 2016, should there be a
			"would you want to give a presentation" question?
			21:46 <@jokeefe> that would be a good addition
			21:48 <@jokeefe> well if there is nothing else, shall we adjourn?
			21:49 <@srevilak> nothing else from me
			21:51 <@jokeefe> will treat that as a 2nd
			21:51 <@jokeefe> all in favor of adjourning?
			21:51 <@srevilak> aye to adjourn
			21:52 <@jokeefe> aye
			21:52 <@aquaticonions> aye
			21:52 <@igel> aye
			21:53 <@srevilak> will post transcript
			</nowiki>

Srevilak: /* Summary */

2016-03-01T02:39:42Z

Summary

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:39, 29 February 2016
Line 58:		Line 58:
	No Phone Backdoors protest (aka no FBiOS) went well. 30 participants. Good press coverage. Follow-up blog post: https://masspirates.org/blog/2016/02/29/tuesdays-no-phone-backdoor-rally-was-a-success.		No Phone Backdoors protest (aka no FBiOS) went well. 30 participants. Good press coverage. Follow-up blog post: https://masspirates.org/blog/2016/02/29/tuesdays-no-phone-backdoor-rally-was-a-success.

	Senate FOIA bill. Main bill was [https://malegislature.gov/Bills/189/Senate/S2120/History S.2120]. A later numbered bill, [https://malegislature.gov/Bills/189/Senate/S2127/History S.2127] is S.2120, with amendments. Marked up copy at [[2015 S.2127 An Act to improve public records]]. Will take some time to digest changes with amendments; plan to bring bill back up for discussion in two weeks (March 14th).		Senate FOIA bill. Main bill was [https://malegislature.gov/Bills/189/Senate/S2120/History S.2120]. A later numbered bill, [https://malegislature.gov/Bills/189/Senate/S2127/History S.2127] is S.2120, with amendments. Marked up copy at [[2015 S.2127 An Act to improve public records]]. Will take some time to digest changes with amendments; plan to bring bill back up for discussion in two weeks (March 14th), during our usual IRC meeting.

			PirateCon 2016. Survey mailed out; post goes up soon.

	== Minutes ==		== Minutes ==

	<nowiki>		<nowiki>

Srevilak: /* Summary */

2016-03-01T02:31:19Z

Summary

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:31, 29 February 2016
Line 58:		Line 58:
	No Phone Backdoors protest (aka no FBiOS) went well. 30 participants. Good press coverage. Follow-up blog post: https://masspirates.org/blog/2016/02/29/tuesdays-no-phone-backdoor-rally-was-a-success.		No Phone Backdoors protest (aka no FBiOS) went well. 30 participants. Good press coverage. Follow-up blog post: https://masspirates.org/blog/2016/02/29/tuesdays-no-phone-backdoor-rally-was-a-success.

	Senate FOIA bill. Main bill was [https://malegislature.gov/Bills/189/Senate/S2120/History S.2120]. A later numbered bill, [https://malegislature.gov/Bills/189/Senate/S2127/History S.2127] is S.2120, with amendments. Marked up copy at [[2015 S.2127 An Act to improve public records]]		Senate FOIA bill. Main bill was [https://malegislature.gov/Bills/189/Senate/S2120/History S.2120]. A later numbered bill, [https://malegislature.gov/Bills/189/Senate/S2127/History S.2127] is S.2120, with amendments. Marked up copy at [[2015 S.2127 An Act to improve public records]]. Will take some time to digest changes with amendments; plan to bring bill back up for discussion in two weeks (March 14th).

	== Minutes ==		== Minutes ==

	<nowiki>		<nowiki>

Srevilak: /* Summary */

2016-03-01T02:18:19Z

Summary

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:18, 29 February 2016
Line 58:		Line 58:
	No Phone Backdoors protest (aka no FBiOS) went well. 30 participants. Good press coverage. Follow-up blog post: https://masspirates.org/blog/2016/02/29/tuesdays-no-phone-backdoor-rally-was-a-success.		No Phone Backdoors protest (aka no FBiOS) went well. 30 participants. Good press coverage. Follow-up blog post: https://masspirates.org/blog/2016/02/29/tuesdays-no-phone-backdoor-rally-was-a-success.

	Senate FOIA bill. Main bill was [https://malegislature.gov/Bills/189/Senate/S2120/History S.2120]. A later numbered bill, [https://malegislature.gov/Bills/189/Senate/S2127/History S.2127] is S.2120, with amendments.		Senate FOIA bill. Main bill was [https://malegislature.gov/Bills/189/Senate/S2120/History S.2120]. A later numbered bill, [https://malegislature.gov/Bills/189/Senate/S2127/History S.2127] is S.2120, with amendments. Marked up copy at [[2015 S.2127 An Act to improve public records]]

	== Minutes ==		== Minutes ==

	<nowiki>		<nowiki>

Srevilak: /* Summary */

2016-03-01T02:17:29Z

Summary

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:17, 29 February 2016
Line 57:		Line 57:

	No Phone Backdoors protest (aka no FBiOS) went well. 30 participants. Good press coverage. Follow-up blog post: https://masspirates.org/blog/2016/02/29/tuesdays-no-phone-backdoor-rally-was-a-success.		No Phone Backdoors protest (aka no FBiOS) went well. 30 participants. Good press coverage. Follow-up blog post: https://masspirates.org/blog/2016/02/29/tuesdays-no-phone-backdoor-rally-was-a-success.

			Senate FOIA bill. Main bill was [https://malegislature.gov/Bills/189/Senate/S2120/History S.2120]. A later numbered bill, [https://malegislature.gov/Bills/189/Senate/S2127/History S.2127] is S.2120, with amendments.

	== Minutes ==		== Minutes ==

	<nowiki>		<nowiki>

Jokeefe at 02:16, 1 March 2016

2016-03-01T02:16:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:16, 29 February 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:

	* MA Senate's public records bill: https://malegislature.gov/Bills/189/Senate/S2120		* MA Senate's public records bill: https://malegislature.gov/Bills/189/Senate/S2120
	* Marked up copy of the bill [[2015 S.2120 An Act to improve public records]]		* Marked up copy of the original bill [[2015 S.2120 An Act to improve public records]]
			* Marked up copy of the amended bill [[2015 S.2127 An Act to improve public records]]
	* [http://www.baystateexaminer.com/articles/foia-bles-critical-mass-records-reform-bill-takes-two-steps-forward-and-one-step-back Bay State Examiner's take on public records law]		* [http://www.baystateexaminer.com/articles/foia-bles-critical-mass-records-reform-bill-takes-two-steps-forward-and-one-step-back Bay State Examiner's take on public records law]

Srevilak: /* Summary */

2016-03-01T02:06:41Z

Summary

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:06, 29 February 2016
Line 55:		Line 55:
	== Summary ==		== Summary ==

			No Phone Backdoors protest (aka no FBiOS) went well. 30 participants. Good press coverage. Follow-up blog post: https://masspirates.org/blog/2016/02/29/tuesdays-no-phone-backdoor-rally-was-a-success.

	== Minutes ==		== Minutes ==

	<nowiki>		<nowiki>

Srevilak: /* Participants */

2016-03-01T02:05:46Z

Participants

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:05, 29 February 2016
Line 42:		Line 42:
	== Participants ==		== Participants ==

	* jokeefe		* jokeefe (James O’Keefe, Somerville)
	* Bluestreak		* Bluestreak (Lucia Fiero, Medway)
	* srevilak		* srevilak (Steve Revilak, Arlington)
	* aquaticonions		* aquaticonions (Eli Haber, Lexington MA)
			* igel (William Fleurant, Arlington MA)

	=== Observers ===		=== Observers ===

	* Pharyngeal		* Pharyngeal
	* igel
	* davidd		* davidd

Jokeefe at 02:02, 1 March 2016

2016-03-01T02:02:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:02, 29 February 2016
Line 6:		Line 6:

	* MA Senate's public records bill: https://malegislature.gov/Bills/189/Senate/S2120		* MA Senate's public records bill: https://malegislature.gov/Bills/189/Senate/S2120
			* Marked up copy of the bill [[2015 S.2120 An Act to improve public records]]
	* [http://www.baystateexaminer.com/articles/foia-bles-critical-mass-records-reform-bill-takes-two-steps-forward-and-one-step-back Bay State Examiner's take on public records law]		* [http://www.baystateexaminer.com/articles/foia-bles-critical-mass-records-reform-bill-takes-two-steps-forward-and-one-step-back Bay State Examiner's take on public records law]