November 20th, 2014 IRC Meeting: Difference between revisions
From Mass Pirate Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
* jokeefe | * jokeefe | ||
* srevilak | * srevilak | ||
* lisbon | |||
* igel | |||
* Kendra | |||
Observers | Observers | ||
Line 40: | Line 43: | ||
<nowiki> | <nowiki> | ||
20:51 < jokeefe> ahoy! | |||
20:58 < srevilak> hi jokeefe | |||
21:00 < srevilak> went to a nice OCPF presentation this evening | |||
21:00 < jokeefe> how did it go? | |||
21:00 < srevilak> I like what they're trying to do with moving everyone | |||
to depository system | |||
21:01 < srevilak> you get visibility into every one | |||
21:01 < srevilak> and nothing staler than 2 weeks old | |||
21:01 < srevilak> Eastern Bank participates in Depository system | |||
21:01 < srevilak> Planning to take forms to them this weeken | |||
21:01 < srevilak> Planning to take forms to them this weekend | |||
21:01 < jokeefe> oh good. was concerned about that | |||
21:01 < srevilak> and ask how much they plan to charge us | |||
21:01 < jokeefe> any extra fees? | |||
21:01 < srevilak> Probably | |||
21:02 < srevilak> in depository system, bank does most of the reporting | |||
21:02 < jokeefe> yes | |||
21:02 < srevilak> we just fill in blanks, what the bank doesn't have | |||
visibility into | |||
21:02 < srevilak> OCPF fellow indicated that most banks charge something | |||
for the additional service | |||
21:02 < jokeefe> hopefully not too much. something to put in the budget | |||
I guess | |||
21:03 < srevilak> Yes, should budget for it | |||
21:03 < srevilak> PLanning to write & distribute notes. Hopefully | |||
tomorrow night | |||
21:03 < jokeefe> lets start | |||
21:03 < jokeefe> Agenda: | |||
https://masspirates.org/wiki/November_20th,_2014_IRC_Meeting | |||
21:03 < jokeefe> ids - James O'Keefe, Somerville | |||
21:03 < srevilak> Steve Revilak - Arlington, MA | |||
21:03 < srevilak> (who will be back in 1 min) | |||
21:04 < jokeefe> k | |||
21:04 < srevilak> back now | |||
21:05 < srevilak> piratecon survey: 10 submissions so far | |||
21:05 < srevilak> If you log into https://masspirates.org/crew/ | |||
21:05 < srevilak> Click `find content' | |||
21:06 < srevilak> click `piratecon2015 questionairre' | |||
21:06 < srevilak> click `results' | |||
21:06 < jokeefe> Oh, good. | |||
21:06 < jokeefe> ahoy lisbon | |||
21:06 < lisbon> hello | |||
21:06 < srevilak> hi lisbon | |||
21:06 < lisbon> how is everyone today | |||
21:07 < jokeefe> doing well, lisbon. you? | |||
21:07 < jokeefe> srevilak, https://masspirates.org/crew/ gets me just | |||
Mass Pirates Crew | |||
21:07 < lisbon> fine, minus the fact they my town dismissed the municipal | |||
fiber idea... | |||
21:08 < jokeefe> nevermind | |||
21:08 < srevilak> jokeefe: append "user" to the URL to get login | |||
21:08 < jokeefe> yes, thank you | |||
21:08 < srevilak> user is to drupal as wp-login.php is to wordpress :) | |||
21:08 < srevilak> lisbon: why'd the town dismiss the fibre idea | |||
21:09 < lisbon> They thought it wasn't possible even though it has been | |||
done by town with far less reasources | |||
21:10 < lisbon> It was worth a shot though | |||
21:11 < jokeefe> what town tried it? | |||
21:11 < lisbon> Im in Ludlow | |||
21:12 < lisbon> western mass | |||
21:12 < jokeefe> yes, but which town with far less resources tried it? | |||
21:14 < jokeefe> srevilak, next email will highlight the survey. | |||
hope to get it out tonight. might do this weekend, though. nights are | |||
less friendly. | |||
21:14 < lisbon> There were a few small towns in Vermont, Rockport maine | |||
and another town whose name I forget | |||
21:14 < lisbon> Rockland Maine I mean | |||
21:14 < jokeefe> cool, lisbon. any case studies of what they did right? | |||
21:15 < jokeefe> Reminder that Noe is looking for help with the SCATV | |||
Pirate Show on net neutrality, 12/15, 6-6:30pm (Noe) | |||
21:15 < jokeefe> agenda at | |||
https://masspirates.org/wiki/November_20th,_2014_IRC_Meeting | |||
21:16 < jokeefe> Next up 3. Review events in person or on-line | |||
21:16 < lisbon> jokeefe, I wasn't able to get the contact information | |||
of the gentleman who gave the presentations but he had detaild from two | |||
case studies | |||
21:16 < lisbon> *details | |||
21:16 < lisbon> what is SCATV? | |||
21:18 < jokeefe> Somerville Community Access TV | |||
21:18 < jokeefe> if you get a copy of the presentations, would love to | |||
read them if you find a link | |||
21:19 * srevilak__ is helping kendra with an IRC problem | |||
21:19 < jokeefe> ah | |||
21:20 < lisbon> I am tring to track down the guy, but he has been pushed | |||
from future mettings due to time restrictions | |||
21:20 < jokeefe> dang | |||
21:20 < lisbon> i noticed the web IRC was't working | |||
21:21 < jokeefe> usuall that is the thing that does work | |||
21:21 < lisbon> clients have always worked for me | |||
21:21 < jokeefe> lisbon, not sure if I asked this, would you be able to | |||
help us find a location for a cryptoparty in your area? We haven't done | |||
one in Western Mass. yet | |||
21:22 < jokeefe> I find clients work at home, but on the work VPN, | |||
the connections keep dropping. | |||
21:22 < lisbon> Cryptoparty: How many people are we talking here? | |||
21:23 < jokeefe> As many as we can get. | |||
21:23 < jokeefe> 10-20 is a good # | |||
21:23 < jokeefe> wireless network is good | |||
21:24 < lisbon> I have a possible place but I think it may be too small, | |||
and the wifi is being "borrowed" from a nearby network. I will look for | |||
other places | |||
21:26 < jokeefe> thanks! | |||
21:27 < jokeefe> Sometime early next year would be good. | |||
21:27 < jokeefe> srevilak, take it you are still distracted? | |||
21:28 < lisbon> Im writing emails in search of venues as we speak | |||
21:28 < jokeefe> cool | |||
21:28 < igel> 'lo | |||
21:28 < jokeefe> hey igel | |||
21:29 < jokeefe> agenda at | |||
https://masspirates.org/wiki/November_20th,_2014_IRC_Meeting | |||
21:29 < jokeefe> we are on item 3 | |||
21:29 < igel> ok | |||
21:29 < srevilak> jokeefe: I had to take some screenshots for kendra | |||
(xchat configuration) | |||
21:29 < srevilak> Hopefully she'll join soon | |||
21:29 < jokeefe> great | |||
21:29 < jokeefe> thank you | |||
21:30 < igel> steve you recomend civic crm> | |||
21:31 < igel> er... recommend CiviCRM | |||
21:31 < jokeefe> So it strikes me that between holidays, the different | |||
review meetings and planning piratecon 2015, we may not have time for | |||
a cryptoparty. opinions? | |||
21:31 < srevilak> An ACLU friend of our wrote to me earlier today | |||
21:31 < srevilak> asking about teaching PGP to some folks | |||
21:32 < srevilak> not the usual cryptoparty, but something I'll try to | |||
help them with | |||
21:32 < srevilak> I may need helpers :) | |||
21:32 < jokeefe> just for ACLU folks or wider audience? | |||
21:32 < srevilak> jokeefe: just ACLU folks | |||
21:32 < jokeefe> ok, I could be a helper | |||
21:32 < srevilak> thx | |||
21:33 < igel> when abouts? | |||
21:33 < srevilak> igel: dunno | |||
21:33 < jokeefe> put out a call for helpers or just ask the regular folks: | |||
Lucia, igel, Kendra | |||
21:33 < srevilak> I'll send more details after we start hammering them out | |||
21:33 < jokeefe> ahoy Kendra | |||
21:33 < srevilak> Kendra: congratulations :) | |||
21:33 < jokeefe> Agenda: | |||
https://masspirates.org/wiki/November_20th,_2014_IRC_Meeting | |||
21:33 < Kendra> Hi, figured it out | |||
21:33 < jokeefe> on item 3 | |||
21:34 < srevilak> jokeefe: 3.1? | |||
21:34 < jokeefe> likely | |||
21:34 < srevilak> ok - Election year review | |||
21:34 < srevilak> we should review :) | |||
21:34 < igel> well, i can help with hands on for sure | |||
21:34 < jokeefe> It strikes me that items 3.1 to 3.5 should probably | |||
happen this year | |||
21:34 < jokeefe> thanks igel | |||
21:34 < srevilak> jokeefe: agreed | |||
21:35 < jokeefe> Think it would be good to schedule them and just | |||
invite people | |||
21:35 < srevilak> jokeefe: I think that would make sense | |||
21:35 < srevilak> would we want to do IPMs at a restaurant, or somewhere | |||
with white board | |||
21:36 < jokeefe> 3.1 Election year review (Jamie) - We need Joe & Noe | |||
as well as the people who helped. | |||
21:37 < jokeefe> I thin e5 would be good. Maybe have them all rolled | |||
into one or two meetings | |||
21:37 < jokeefe> One Nov. and one Dec. in different locations? | |||
21:37 < srevilak> jokeefe: I think that sounds good | |||
21:37 < Kendra> We are probably also welcome to hold things at South | |||
End tech Center if we schedule ahead of time | |||
21:37 < igel> i got to run | |||
21:38 < srevilak> night igel | |||
21:38 < igel> hi Kendra | |||
21:38 < jokeefe> bye igel | |||
21:38 < igel> hey can i.. i'll email you | |||
21:38 < srevilak> igel: email anytime | |||
21:38 < jokeefe> thanks, Kendra. That could work as well. | |||
21:38 < igel> cheers | |||
21:38 < srevilak> for campaign post-mortem, maybe someplace between | |||
metro boston and Bellingham? | |||
21:39 < jokeefe> Sure, will ask Joe/Lucia/Jason | |||
21:39 < Kendra> The last free software meet up in chelmsworth I think | |||
was another larger group. I am not sure that was the name of the city. | |||
21:39 < srevilak> I'm interested in hearing Joe's thoughts about how | |||
campaign went | |||
21:40 < jokeefe> me too. | |||
21:40 < srevilak> Kendra: chelmsford, perhaps? | |||
21:40 < jokeefe> Chelmsford is way North of Bellingham | |||
21:40 < Kendra> That might be it. There were some campaign workers | |||
there who had never met Pirate Party members and they were interested | |||
in having us visit in the future. | |||
21:41 < Kendra> There were about 20 people at their monthly meet up | |||
21:41 < jokeefe> Which group was that again? | |||
21:41 < srevilak> Kendra: do you recall name of venue, or can you | |||
find out? | |||
21:42 < Kendra> It was a free software meet up group that originated | |||
in Worchester and migrated over there. I will ask Micky Metts for the | |||
deets or check if I see it in my email somewhere. | |||
21:43 < srevilak> Kendra: thx | |||
21:43 < jokeefe> did any of you get a chance to look at the software | |||
that Falkvinge put up and I emailed about earlier today? | |||
21:44 < srevilak> jokeefe: I started looking over the system side of | |||
things (like software prerequisites) | |||
21:44 < srevilak> it's mono, requires a special mono build, and a special | |||
apache module | |||
21:45 < jokeefe> think we can install it on the system? | |||
21:45 < srevilak> Likely not something we'd be able to host on a standard | |||
mayfirst mosh | |||
21:46 < Kendra> Chelmsford Linux Meetup group | |||
http://www.meetup.com/linux-393/ | |||
21:46 < srevilak> put another way, I'd want to see how badly one would | |||
have to hack up a standard MFPL server to get the swarm thing to work | |||
21:46 < srevilak> but I'm not optimistic | |||
21:47 < jokeefe> hmmm | |||
21:47 < srevilak> of course, try and see is best way to find out | |||
21:47 < jokeefe> Well, maybe see if we can just get it up on a linux | |||
box and go from there. Not fond of C# | |||
21:47 < srevilak> sadly, C# backend with custom mono build is not what | |||
I had hoped for | |||
21:48 < jokeefe> yes | |||
21:49 < srevilak> ok - for Election year review, sounds like we need to | |||
get some input from Joe, Noe, and their respective campaign helps | |||
21:49 < srevilak> ok - for Election year review, sounds like we need to | |||
get some input from Joe, Noe, and their respective campaign helpers | |||
21:50 < jokeefe> yes | |||
21:50 < srevilak> move on to 3.2? | |||
21:50 < jokeefe> Roll them up into two meetings (Boston & | |||
Worcester/Bellingham areas)? | |||
21:50 < jokeefe> 3.1 to 3.5? | |||
21:51 < srevilak> jokeefe: I think that's reasonable | |||
21:51 < jokeefe> Then help with ACLU cryptoparty | |||
21:51 < jokeefe> And talk with Chelmsford linux group about coming to | |||
their meeting early 2015 to do what? | |||
21:51 < srevilak> That said, doing 1 meeting with 3.1, 3.4, 3.5 | |||
21:52 < jokeefe> putting poll together for meetings | |||
21:52 < srevilak> the second meeting meeting with 3.2, 3.4, 3.5 | |||
21:52 < Kendra> The Chelmford group was interested in a cryptoparty | |||
21:52 < srevilak> 3.1, 3.2 being main focus, 3.4 3.5 being additional | |||
21:52 < jokeefe> Agreed. I think having 5-10 minutes to go over 3.3 | |||
would be good. | |||
21:53 < srevilak> jokeefe: that works | |||
21:53 < jokeefe> Really want more people to send email blasts | |||
21:53 < jokeefe> so I am not SPoF | |||
21:53 < srevilak> SPoF? | |||
21:53 < jokeefe> single point of failure | |||
21:53 < srevilak> ah | |||
21:53 < Kendra> I was going to start putting our events out on my linked | |||
in page because I have connected to a lot of tech and community activist | |||
types on there. | |||
21:54 < Kendra> That's my strategy | |||
21:54 < srevilak> Kendra - sorry to jump around. Chelmsford group sounds | |||
like a decent opportunity to do stuff | |||
21:54 < srevilak> esp if they've never heard about pirates | |||
21:55 < Kendra> Oh, but that was the good part. They had heard about | |||
us and wanted to hear more. Election workers had seen us on the ballots. | |||
21:55 < jokeefe> cool. I'll invite you to the MAPP linked in group, | |||
Kendra | |||
21:55 < srevilak> There's a MAPP linked in group? | |||
21:55 < Kendra> The more you know | |||
21:55 < srevilak> I had no idea! | |||
21:55 < Kendra> Me neither | |||
21:55 < jokeefe> yes, it doesn't get much love, srevilak | |||
21:56 < Kendra> Well that's gonna change | |||
21:56 < jokeefe> great! | |||
21:57 < lisbon> Regarding a Cryptoparty in Western Massachusetts: I have | |||
a possible opportunity to get a conference area in the Massachusetts | |||
green high performance computing center (http://www.mghpcc.org/) I have | |||
gotten a response from someone who proposed it to their supervisor and | |||
I will probably get a response within the next few days. | |||
21:58 < jokeefe> wonderful, lisbon! just email info@masspirates.org | |||
when you know | |||
21:58 < lisbon> will do | |||
21:58 < srevilak> lisbon: wow, that's great. Thank! | |||
21:58 < srevilak> lisbon: wow, that's great. Thanks! | |||
21:59 < jokeefe> srevilak, looks like you are on the linked in group, | |||
but not sure how to make you an admin | |||
22:00 < jokeefe> Kendra, it is at | |||
https://www.linkedin.com/groups/Massachusetts-Pirate-Party-4176295?gid=4176295&trk=vsrp_groups_res_name&trkInfo=VSRPsearchId%3A111847511416538653393%2CVSRPtargetId%3A4176295%2CVSRPcmpt%3Aprimary | |||
22:00 < srevilak> jokeefe: yes, I just found it and joined | |||
22:00 < jokeefe> great | |||
22:01 < jokeefe> we are at time. have a poll | |||
22:01 < jokeefe> at | |||
https://masspirates.org/crew/polls/what-days-work-reviewplanning-meetings | |||
22:01 < jokeefe> but not sure how to change so it is all that apply | |||
22:02 < Kendra> I joined too | |||
22:02 < srevilak> jokeefe: in field configuration, there's a "multiple" | |||
checkbox | |||
22:03 < srevilak> jokeefe: congrats on your entry into drupal hacking :) | |||
22:03 < jokeefe> thanks, though I have done this in the distant past | |||
22:03 < jokeefe> not seeing a field configuration | |||
22:04 < jokeefe> is there a way for any polls to appear on the front page? | |||
22:04 < srevilak> oh, it's not a webform | |||
22:04 < jokeefe> maybe with a sign up form? | |||
22:05 < jokeefe> while srevilak and I deal with this, do we have a motion | |||
to adjourn since we are at time? | |||
22:05 < srevilak> motion to adjourn | |||
22:05 < Kendra> 2nd | |||
22:05 < srevilak> jokeefe: from https://masspirates.org/crew/node/add | |||
22:06 < srevilak> Try "webform" | |||
22:06 < Kendra> all in favor of adjourning? | |||
22:06 < jokeefe> aye | |||
22:06 < jokeefe> will do srevilak | |||
22:06 < Kendra> aye | |||
22:07 < lisbon> aye | |||
22:07 < Kendra> nite all | |||
22:07 < lisbon> bye | |||
22:07 < srevilak> jokeefe: I think polls are intended to be really simple: | |||
one question, couple of choices | |||
22:08 < srevilak> for one question, multiple choice, webform might be | |||
more appropriate | |||
22:08 < jokeefe> is fieldset what I am looking for? | |||
22:08 < srevilak> fieldset is a group of related fields | |||
22:08 < srevilak> let's see | |||
22:09 < srevilak> "Select options" is what you want | |||
22:09 < jokeefe> thanks | |||
22:10 < srevilak> on edit screen for a "select options" field "multiple" | |||
gives you multiple choice checkboxes. multiple (unchecked) gives | |||
radio buttons | |||
22:11 < jokeefe> ok, think I have it | |||
22:11 * srevilak goes to post notes | |||
</nowiki> |
Latest revision as of 22:13, 20 November 2014
Review
Decisions/Events Status
- PirateCon 2015 survey status (Steve)
- SCATV Pirate Show on net neutrality, 12/15, 6-6:30pm (Noe)
- Review events in person or on-line
- Election year review (?)
- 2015 Budget/Fundraising planning/review of 2014 spending/accounts (Steve)
- Hands on with CiviCRM (Steve)
- Figuring out how we open up decision making/participation to more people (Jamie)
- Issue development process (?)
- Planning events for the rest of the year, especially outside the Boston-area (?)
- Next Cryptoparty - Train the trainers?
Participants
- jokeefe
- srevilak
- lisbon
- igel
- Kendra
Observers
- davidd
- decipherstatic
- Pharyngeal
- zby
Events Summary
- Dec. 6, Radical Reference Collective: Privacy Workshop for Library Professionals, 2-5pm, Simmons College
- Dec. 12, The Pirate Show on SCATV
- May 6, 2015, International Day against DRM.
Every Thu., Digital Fourth meeting, 11:20am-1:30pm, Voltage Cafe, Third Street, Cambridge
Summary
Minutes
20:51 < jokeefe> ahoy! 20:58 < srevilak> hi jokeefe 21:00 < srevilak> went to a nice OCPF presentation this evening 21:00 < jokeefe> how did it go? 21:00 < srevilak> I like what they're trying to do with moving everyone to depository system 21:01 < srevilak> you get visibility into every one 21:01 < srevilak> and nothing staler than 2 weeks old 21:01 < srevilak> Eastern Bank participates in Depository system 21:01 < srevilak> Planning to take forms to them this weeken 21:01 < srevilak> Planning to take forms to them this weekend 21:01 < jokeefe> oh good. was concerned about that 21:01 < srevilak> and ask how much they plan to charge us 21:01 < jokeefe> any extra fees? 21:01 < srevilak> Probably 21:02 < srevilak> in depository system, bank does most of the reporting 21:02 < jokeefe> yes 21:02 < srevilak> we just fill in blanks, what the bank doesn't have visibility into 21:02 < srevilak> OCPF fellow indicated that most banks charge something for the additional service 21:02 < jokeefe> hopefully not too much. something to put in the budget I guess 21:03 < srevilak> Yes, should budget for it 21:03 < srevilak> PLanning to write & distribute notes. Hopefully tomorrow night 21:03 < jokeefe> lets start 21:03 < jokeefe> Agenda: https://masspirates.org/wiki/November_20th,_2014_IRC_Meeting 21:03 < jokeefe> ids - James O'Keefe, Somerville 21:03 < srevilak> Steve Revilak - Arlington, MA 21:03 < srevilak> (who will be back in 1 min) 21:04 < jokeefe> k 21:04 < srevilak> back now 21:05 < srevilak> piratecon survey: 10 submissions so far 21:05 < srevilak> If you log into https://masspirates.org/crew/ 21:05 < srevilak> Click `find content' 21:06 < srevilak> click `piratecon2015 questionairre' 21:06 < srevilak> click `results' 21:06 < jokeefe> Oh, good. 21:06 < jokeefe> ahoy lisbon 21:06 < lisbon> hello 21:06 < srevilak> hi lisbon 21:06 < lisbon> how is everyone today 21:07 < jokeefe> doing well, lisbon. you? 21:07 < jokeefe> srevilak, https://masspirates.org/crew/ gets me just Mass Pirates Crew 21:07 < lisbon> fine, minus the fact they my town dismissed the municipal fiber idea... 21:08 < jokeefe> nevermind 21:08 < srevilak> jokeefe: append "user" to the URL to get login 21:08 < jokeefe> yes, thank you 21:08 < srevilak> user is to drupal as wp-login.php is to wordpress :) 21:08 < srevilak> lisbon: why'd the town dismiss the fibre idea 21:09 < lisbon> They thought it wasn't possible even though it has been done by town with far less reasources 21:10 < lisbon> It was worth a shot though 21:11 < jokeefe> what town tried it? 21:11 < lisbon> Im in Ludlow 21:12 < lisbon> western mass 21:12 < jokeefe> yes, but which town with far less resources tried it? 21:14 < jokeefe> srevilak, next email will highlight the survey. hope to get it out tonight. might do this weekend, though. nights are less friendly. 21:14 < lisbon> There were a few small towns in Vermont, Rockport maine and another town whose name I forget 21:14 < lisbon> Rockland Maine I mean 21:14 < jokeefe> cool, lisbon. any case studies of what they did right? 21:15 < jokeefe> Reminder that Noe is looking for help with the SCATV Pirate Show on net neutrality, 12/15, 6-6:30pm (Noe) 21:15 < jokeefe> agenda at https://masspirates.org/wiki/November_20th,_2014_IRC_Meeting 21:16 < jokeefe> Next up 3. Review events in person or on-line 21:16 < lisbon> jokeefe, I wasn't able to get the contact information of the gentleman who gave the presentations but he had detaild from two case studies 21:16 < lisbon> *details 21:16 < lisbon> what is SCATV? 21:18 < jokeefe> Somerville Community Access TV 21:18 < jokeefe> if you get a copy of the presentations, would love to read them if you find a link 21:19 * srevilak__ is helping kendra with an IRC problem 21:19 < jokeefe> ah 21:20 < lisbon> I am tring to track down the guy, but he has been pushed from future mettings due to time restrictions 21:20 < jokeefe> dang 21:20 < lisbon> i noticed the web IRC was't working 21:21 < jokeefe> usuall that is the thing that does work 21:21 < lisbon> clients have always worked for me 21:21 < jokeefe> lisbon, not sure if I asked this, would you be able to help us find a location for a cryptoparty in your area? We haven't done one in Western Mass. yet 21:22 < jokeefe> I find clients work at home, but on the work VPN, the connections keep dropping. 21:22 < lisbon> Cryptoparty: How many people are we talking here? 21:23 < jokeefe> As many as we can get. 21:23 < jokeefe> 10-20 is a good # 21:23 < jokeefe> wireless network is good 21:24 < lisbon> I have a possible place but I think it may be too small, and the wifi is being "borrowed" from a nearby network. I will look for other places 21:26 < jokeefe> thanks! 21:27 < jokeefe> Sometime early next year would be good. 21:27 < jokeefe> srevilak, take it you are still distracted? 21:28 < lisbon> Im writing emails in search of venues as we speak 21:28 < jokeefe> cool 21:28 < igel> 'lo 21:28 < jokeefe> hey igel 21:29 < jokeefe> agenda at https://masspirates.org/wiki/November_20th,_2014_IRC_Meeting 21:29 < jokeefe> we are on item 3 21:29 < igel> ok 21:29 < srevilak> jokeefe: I had to take some screenshots for kendra (xchat configuration) 21:29 < srevilak> Hopefully she'll join soon 21:29 < jokeefe> great 21:29 < jokeefe> thank you 21:30 < igel> steve you recomend civic crm> 21:31 < igel> er... recommend CiviCRM 21:31 < jokeefe> So it strikes me that between holidays, the different review meetings and planning piratecon 2015, we may not have time for a cryptoparty. opinions? 21:31 < srevilak> An ACLU friend of our wrote to me earlier today 21:31 < srevilak> asking about teaching PGP to some folks 21:32 < srevilak> not the usual cryptoparty, but something I'll try to help them with 21:32 < srevilak> I may need helpers :) 21:32 < jokeefe> just for ACLU folks or wider audience? 21:32 < srevilak> jokeefe: just ACLU folks 21:32 < jokeefe> ok, I could be a helper 21:32 < srevilak> thx 21:33 < igel> when abouts? 21:33 < srevilak> igel: dunno 21:33 < jokeefe> put out a call for helpers or just ask the regular folks: Lucia, igel, Kendra 21:33 < srevilak> I'll send more details after we start hammering them out 21:33 < jokeefe> ahoy Kendra 21:33 < srevilak> Kendra: congratulations :) 21:33 < jokeefe> Agenda: https://masspirates.org/wiki/November_20th,_2014_IRC_Meeting 21:33 < Kendra> Hi, figured it out 21:33 < jokeefe> on item 3 21:34 < srevilak> jokeefe: 3.1? 21:34 < jokeefe> likely 21:34 < srevilak> ok - Election year review 21:34 < srevilak> we should review :) 21:34 < igel> well, i can help with hands on for sure 21:34 < jokeefe> It strikes me that items 3.1 to 3.5 should probably happen this year 21:34 < jokeefe> thanks igel 21:34 < srevilak> jokeefe: agreed 21:35 < jokeefe> Think it would be good to schedule them and just invite people 21:35 < srevilak> jokeefe: I think that would make sense 21:35 < srevilak> would we want to do IPMs at a restaurant, or somewhere with white board 21:36 < jokeefe> 3.1 Election year review (Jamie) - We need Joe & Noe as well as the people who helped. 21:37 < jokeefe> I thin e5 would be good. Maybe have them all rolled into one or two meetings 21:37 < jokeefe> One Nov. and one Dec. in different locations? 21:37 < srevilak> jokeefe: I think that sounds good 21:37 < Kendra> We are probably also welcome to hold things at South End tech Center if we schedule ahead of time 21:37 < igel> i got to run 21:38 < srevilak> night igel 21:38 < igel> hi Kendra 21:38 < jokeefe> bye igel 21:38 < igel> hey can i.. i'll email you 21:38 < srevilak> igel: email anytime 21:38 < jokeefe> thanks, Kendra. That could work as well. 21:38 < igel> cheers 21:38 < srevilak> for campaign post-mortem, maybe someplace between metro boston and Bellingham? 21:39 < jokeefe> Sure, will ask Joe/Lucia/Jason 21:39 < Kendra> The last free software meet up in chelmsworth I think was another larger group. I am not sure that was the name of the city. 21:39 < srevilak> I'm interested in hearing Joe's thoughts about how campaign went 21:40 < jokeefe> me too. 21:40 < srevilak> Kendra: chelmsford, perhaps? 21:40 < jokeefe> Chelmsford is way North of Bellingham 21:40 < Kendra> That might be it. There were some campaign workers there who had never met Pirate Party members and they were interested in having us visit in the future. 21:41 < Kendra> There were about 20 people at their monthly meet up 21:41 < jokeefe> Which group was that again? 21:41 < srevilak> Kendra: do you recall name of venue, or can you find out? 21:42 < Kendra> It was a free software meet up group that originated in Worchester and migrated over there. I will ask Micky Metts for the deets or check if I see it in my email somewhere. 21:43 < srevilak> Kendra: thx 21:43 < jokeefe> did any of you get a chance to look at the software that Falkvinge put up and I emailed about earlier today? 21:44 < srevilak> jokeefe: I started looking over the system side of things (like software prerequisites) 21:44 < srevilak> it's mono, requires a special mono build, and a special apache module 21:45 < jokeefe> think we can install it on the system? 21:45 < srevilak> Likely not something we'd be able to host on a standard mayfirst mosh 21:46 < Kendra> Chelmsford Linux Meetup group http://www.meetup.com/linux-393/ 21:46 < srevilak> put another way, I'd want to see how badly one would have to hack up a standard MFPL server to get the swarm thing to work 21:46 < srevilak> but I'm not optimistic 21:47 < jokeefe> hmmm 21:47 < srevilak> of course, try and see is best way to find out 21:47 < jokeefe> Well, maybe see if we can just get it up on a linux box and go from there. Not fond of C# 21:47 < srevilak> sadly, C# backend with custom mono build is not what I had hoped for 21:48 < jokeefe> yes 21:49 < srevilak> ok - for Election year review, sounds like we need to get some input from Joe, Noe, and their respective campaign helps 21:49 < srevilak> ok - for Election year review, sounds like we need to get some input from Joe, Noe, and their respective campaign helpers 21:50 < jokeefe> yes 21:50 < srevilak> move on to 3.2? 21:50 < jokeefe> Roll them up into two meetings (Boston & Worcester/Bellingham areas)? 21:50 < jokeefe> 3.1 to 3.5? 21:51 < srevilak> jokeefe: I think that's reasonable 21:51 < jokeefe> Then help with ACLU cryptoparty 21:51 < jokeefe> And talk with Chelmsford linux group about coming to their meeting early 2015 to do what? 21:51 < srevilak> That said, doing 1 meeting with 3.1, 3.4, 3.5 21:52 < jokeefe> putting poll together for meetings 21:52 < srevilak> the second meeting meeting with 3.2, 3.4, 3.5 21:52 < Kendra> The Chelmford group was interested in a cryptoparty 21:52 < srevilak> 3.1, 3.2 being main focus, 3.4 3.5 being additional 21:52 < jokeefe> Agreed. I think having 5-10 minutes to go over 3.3 would be good. 21:53 < srevilak> jokeefe: that works 21:53 < jokeefe> Really want more people to send email blasts 21:53 < jokeefe> so I am not SPoF 21:53 < srevilak> SPoF? 21:53 < jokeefe> single point of failure 21:53 < srevilak> ah 21:53 < Kendra> I was going to start putting our events out on my linked in page because I have connected to a lot of tech and community activist types on there. 21:54 < Kendra> That's my strategy 21:54 < srevilak> Kendra - sorry to jump around. Chelmsford group sounds like a decent opportunity to do stuff 21:54 < srevilak> esp if they've never heard about pirates 21:55 < Kendra> Oh, but that was the good part. They had heard about us and wanted to hear more. Election workers had seen us on the ballots. 21:55 < jokeefe> cool. I'll invite you to the MAPP linked in group, Kendra 21:55 < srevilak> There's a MAPP linked in group? 21:55 < Kendra> The more you know 21:55 < srevilak> I had no idea! 21:55 < Kendra> Me neither 21:55 < jokeefe> yes, it doesn't get much love, srevilak 21:56 < Kendra> Well that's gonna change 21:56 < jokeefe> great! 21:57 < lisbon> Regarding a Cryptoparty in Western Massachusetts: I have a possible opportunity to get a conference area in the Massachusetts green high performance computing center (http://www.mghpcc.org/) I have gotten a response from someone who proposed it to their supervisor and I will probably get a response within the next few days. 21:58 < jokeefe> wonderful, lisbon! just email info@masspirates.org when you know 21:58 < lisbon> will do 21:58 < srevilak> lisbon: wow, that's great. Thank! 21:58 < srevilak> lisbon: wow, that's great. Thanks! 21:59 < jokeefe> srevilak, looks like you are on the linked in group, but not sure how to make you an admin 22:00 < jokeefe> Kendra, it is at https://www.linkedin.com/groups/Massachusetts-Pirate-Party-4176295?gid=4176295&trk=vsrp_groups_res_name&trkInfo=VSRPsearchId%3A111847511416538653393%2CVSRPtargetId%3A4176295%2CVSRPcmpt%3Aprimary 22:00 < srevilak> jokeefe: yes, I just found it and joined 22:00 < jokeefe> great 22:01 < jokeefe> we are at time. have a poll 22:01 < jokeefe> at https://masspirates.org/crew/polls/what-days-work-reviewplanning-meetings 22:01 < jokeefe> but not sure how to change so it is all that apply 22:02 < Kendra> I joined too 22:02 < srevilak> jokeefe: in field configuration, there's a "multiple" checkbox 22:03 < srevilak> jokeefe: congrats on your entry into drupal hacking :) 22:03 < jokeefe> thanks, though I have done this in the distant past 22:03 < jokeefe> not seeing a field configuration 22:04 < jokeefe> is there a way for any polls to appear on the front page? 22:04 < srevilak> oh, it's not a webform 22:04 < jokeefe> maybe with a sign up form? 22:05 < jokeefe> while srevilak and I deal with this, do we have a motion to adjourn since we are at time? 22:05 < srevilak> motion to adjourn 22:05 < Kendra> 2nd 22:05 < srevilak> jokeefe: from https://masspirates.org/crew/node/add 22:06 < srevilak> Try "webform" 22:06 < Kendra> all in favor of adjourning? 22:06 < jokeefe> aye 22:06 < jokeefe> will do srevilak 22:06 < Kendra> aye 22:07 < lisbon> aye 22:07 < Kendra> nite all 22:07 < lisbon> bye 22:07 < srevilak> jokeefe: I think polls are intended to be really simple: one question, couple of choices 22:08 < srevilak> for one question, multiple choice, webform might be more appropriate 22:08 < jokeefe> is fieldset what I am looking for? 22:08 < srevilak> fieldset is a group of related fields 22:08 < srevilak> let's see 22:09 < srevilak> "Select options" is what you want 22:09 < jokeefe> thanks 22:10 < srevilak> on edit screen for a "select options" field "multiple" gives you multiple choice checkboxes. multiple (unchecked) gives radio buttons 22:11 < jokeefe> ok, think I have it 22:11 * srevilak goes to post notes