November 13th, 2014 IRC Meeting

From Mass Pirate Wiki
Revision as of 23:10, 1 February 2018 by Jokeefe (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Review

  1. Event Review
    1. Pirate Social

Decisions/Events Status

  1. Possible Town Meeting Warrants to propose. (for illustration Arlington 2014 warrant)
  2. PirateCon 2015 planning
  3. Next Cryptoparty?
  4. Budget
  5. Fundraising

Participants

  • jokeefe (James O'Keefe, Somerville)
  • Bluestreak
  • srevilak

Observers

  • davidd
  • Pharyngeal
  • decipherstatic
  • zby

Events Summary

  1. Dec. 6, Radical Reference Collective: Privacy Workshop for Library Professionals, 2-5pm, Simmons College
  2. May 6, 2015, International Day against DRM.

Every Thu., Digital Fourth meeting, 11:20am-1:30pm, Voltage Cafe, Third Street, Cambridge

Summary

Minutes

 
20:55 < Bluestreak> ahoy!
20:59 < srevilak> hi all
21:00 < jokeefe> ahoy, srevilak!
21:00 < jokeefe> agenda -
        https://masspirates.org/wiki/November_13th,_2014_IRC_Meeting
21:00 < jokeefe> ids - James O'Keefe, Somerville
21:01 < Bluestreak> Lucia Fiero
21:02 < srevilak> Steve Revilak, Arlington, MA
21:03 < jokeefe> any items folks want to add to the agenda?
21:03 < Bluestreak> I am having a bad week.
21:03 < Bluestreak> Very little enthusiasm
21:05 < jokeefe> Yeah. Hope it gets better.
21:06 < srevilak> jokeefe: agenda item: proposing legislation
21:06 < Bluestreak> Thanks.
21:06 < jokeefe> good, srevilak
21:07 < jokeefe> added
21:07 < jokeefe> anyone want to summarize the social?
21:08 < Bluestreak> Who else considered Jordan a troll?
21:09 < jokeefe> everyone is welcome so as long as they are not abusive
        or disruptive.
21:10 < Bluestreak> He was both.
21:10 < jokeefe> The social was fun.  Decent turn out, with lots of good
        people in attendence.  Should have one for the holidays possibly.
21:10 < Bluestreak> in my experience.
21:10 < Bluestreak> Lovely of course.
21:10 < srevilak> Bluestreak: at times, he went slightly beyond friendly
        challenges.  That said, I don't mind being challenged.  I'm happy to
        defend our viewpoints
21:10 < Bluestreak> So nice to see Joan
21:10 < Bluestreak> I defended every point utterly
21:11 < jokeefe> Good practice, then ;-)
21:11 < srevilak> jokeefe: agreed
21:11 < Bluestreak> he ran out of challenges but persisted, I called
        him on it
21:11 < Bluestreak> didn't lose my cool
21:11 < Bluestreak> so yeah good practice
21:11 < Bluestreak> Rio was so ...
21:12 < Bluestreak> interested isn't a strong enough word...
21:12 < jokeefe> curious and friendly
21:12 < Bluestreak> in what we had accomplished and how
21:12 < Bluestreak> i liked her.
21:12 < Bluestreak> wished she lived here
21:14 < jokeefe> moving on to Possible Town Meeting Warrants to propose
21:14 < jokeefe> the more pirates the better, Bluestreak, she would
        be good
21:15 < srevilak> I have one idea: would like to propose that all town
        websites use https exclusively
21:15 < srevilak> warrant article ^^^
21:16 < srevilak> I'd like to start small.
21:16 < srevilak> I like https requirement for two reasons:
21:16 < jokeefe> true, might help if you offered to help them with it.
21:16 < srevilak> (1) brings up issues regarding privacy
21:17 < srevilak> (2) prevents telcos from conducting MITM attacks
21:17 < Bluestreak> jokes sent you email
21:17 < Bluestreak> jokeefe fucking autocorrect
21:18 < Bluestreak> sent you an email jokeefe
21:18 < srevilak> any other suggestions on legislation
21:18 < jokeefe> thanks, Bluestreak
21:18 < srevilak> also - what's procedure for other towns (e.g.,
        somerville)
21:18 < srevilak> or medway, for that matter?
21:19 < jokeefe> Somerville is a city so it needs to go before the
        board of Alderman.  Arlington has elected town meeting, so procedure is
        more open
21:19 < jokeefe> srevilak, thinking there are others out there.  Not sure
        if the could endorse Pass. Mass. Amendment.
21:20 < jokeefe> wonder if there is a surveillance warrant
21:20 < srevilak> last year, or maybe two years ago, Occupy Arlington
        introduced a "corporations are not people" warrant
21:20 < jokeefe> police won't comply with surveillance by NSA or use
        proceeds of such surveillance
21:22 < srevilak> jokeefe: I like the idea.  Only reservation: I don't
        have much factual background on local PD
21:22 < srevilak> Guess it's time to start making public records requests,
        and researching town budget
21:22 < srevilak> I'm not involved in local politics as much as I should
        be :(
21:23 < jokeefe> when do you have to submit them?
21:23 < jokeefe> and do you know your local town meeting member?
21:24 < jokeefe> BTW: here are the Artlington
        town committee/commission/board openings
        http://www.arlingtonma.gov/town-governance/all-boards-and-committees/committee-openings
21:25 < jokeefe> and when are the elections?
21:26 < srevilak> Elections are usually in spring
21:26 < srevilak> Town meeting is in april
21:26 < srevilak> Warrant articles close on Jan 30th
21:26 < jokeefe> good, time to get things ready.
21:27 < jokeefe> Suggest you make it a blog post and ask for others
        to offer their suggestions.  Way to get people in and get some draft
        Warrants written.
21:28 < srevilak> jokeefe: will give that some thought
21:28 < jokeefe> Making FOIA easier in Arlington would also be good.
        Find out what isn't public record, so make it, or what isn't shared,
        but could be
21:28 < srevilak> Agreed.
21:28 < srevilak> I've only filed one public records request w/town,
        and that was a few years ago
21:29 < srevilak> hmmm..there's a bicycle committee :)
21:30 < jokeefe> apply
21:30 < jokeefe> also, we need to review this:
        http://files.ocpf.us/pdf/guides/muni_candidate_2012.pdf
21:31 < jokeefe> This caught my eye: This brochure is designed to
        address issues concerning candidates for elected municipal office (not
        for members of a representative town meeting, who are exempted from the
        reporting and disclosure provisions of the campaign finance law)
21:31 < jokeefe> .
21:31 < srevilak> speaking of OCPF, next Thu I will be going to an info
        session @ OCPF
21:32 < srevilak> Re: our transition to depository status
21:32 < jokeefe> thanks.  Wondering if you could run as elected town
        meeting member and still be our treasurer.  I would help with your
        campaign.
21:32 < srevilak> I should write OCPF and ask
21:32 < jokeefe> The Greens didn't use their software and were able to
        get around it, though I guess we could run it in a VM
21:33 < srevilak> I should write OCPF and ask (about town meeting)
21:33 < srevilak> Arlington town meeting only requires 10 signatures to
        get on the ballot
21:34 < srevilak> jokeefe: the pirate treasurer does not do windows
21:35 < jokeefe> I think if you can upload in their format, it is ok
21:35 < jokeefe> For the record:
        http://arlingtonma.gov/town-governance/town-meeting
21:35 < jokeefe> Annual Town Election to be held March 28, 2015
21:35 < jokeefe> First night of Town Meeting will be April 27, 2015
21:36 < Bluestreak> Is ... Steve running?
21:36 < jokeefe> 252 for 21 precincts.  12 per precinct, 1/3 up every
        year. so 4 to be elected this year in a block voting system.
21:37 < jokeefe> Considering.  More research to be done.
21:37 < Bluestreak> Am...I running?
21:37 < jokeefe> Do you have elected town meeting?
21:37 < Bluestreak> please reply to email
21:37 < jokeefe> I think only 31 towns do
21:37 < Bluestreak> we have selectmen
21:37 < Bluestreak> and town meeting
21:38 < Bluestreak>
        http://www.townofmedway.org/Pages/MedwayMA_Bcomm/BOS/index
21:38 < jokeefe> We need to figure out if you can be an officer in the
        party and run for local office.  Know there are limitations on treasurer,
        IIRC.
21:39 < Bluestreak> Shit, Jason could do (EPFRAC) He was on conservation
        commission in CT
21:39 < Bluestreak> Jason.
21:39 < Bluestreak> Jason should run
21:39 < Bluestreak> Ppl fucking love him
21:39 < jokeefe> Town charter is not text - scanned image.  Ugh -
        http://www.townofmedway.org/Pages/MedwayMA_Bcomm/BOS/towncharter.pdf
21:39 < Bluestreak> Every teacher our kids have had would vote for him
21:39 < jokeefe> he should run!
21:40 < Bluestreak> </3
21:40 < srevilak> http://files.ocpf.us/pdf/legaldocs/AO-95-03.pdf
21:40 < Bluestreak> Email
21:41 < srevilak> Town meeting member is not an "elective public office"
        within the meaning of MGL 55
21:41 < srevilak> Woo hoo!
21:41 < Bluestreak> So...?
21:41 < srevilak> Bluestreak: in other words, I can run for town meeting,
        even though I'm a PAC treasurer
21:42 < jokeefe> There is more there, but it is encouraging
21:43 < jokeefe> Well lets get the voter history and voters of your
        precinct and start planning!
21:43 < jokeefe> Going to move things along
21:43 < jokeefe> PirateCon 2015 planning
21:44 < srevilak> will make next round of survey changes tomorrow evening
21:44 < jokeefe> Any further comments on the survey?
21:44 < Bluestreak> No woed from Cory :-(
21:44 < Bluestreak> word
21:44 < srevilak> Bluestreak: who's Cory?
21:44 < Bluestreak> Can't decide on a date until i hear from him
21:44 < Bluestreak> Doctorow
21:44 < Bluestreak> dude said if we scheduled when he is in town then
        he would appear for no speaking fee
21:45 < Bluestreak> blah bla bah
21:45 < jokeefe> Right, but we can ask supporters what dates work
        for them.
21:45 < Bluestreak> all talk
21:45 < Bluestreak> so hung up on his promise...
21:45 < jokeefe> Pretty major to come from the UK.  Airfares aren't cheap.
21:45 < Bluestreak> I want names to draw ppl out
21:45 < Bluestreak> yes but he is herea ll the time
21:46 < Bluestreak> lessig live here
21:46 < Bluestreak> he should speak
21:46 < Bluestreak> these guys are all talk
21:46 < Bluestreak> take money out of politics
21:46 < Bluestreak> fuck that they all want to get paid
21:46 < srevilak> I'd like to invite Brother Charles and Lolita Kelsey
21:46 < Bluestreak> #fedup
21:46 < Bluestreak> #annoyed
21:46 < Bluestreak> ...
21:46 < jokeefe> lessig, certainly in the area.  Doctorow hasn't been
        here that often.
21:46 < Bluestreak> Good idea
21:47 < jokeefe> would be good to invite Brother Charles and Lolita
21:47 < Bluestreak> Was here to sell us his book tho want he
21:47 < jokeefe> any comments on the survey?
21:47 < srevilak> Also, for all of the mass surveilance that goes on,
        would like to get people of color to talk about their experiences,
        pre and post snowden
21:47 < Bluestreak> Better idea to invite our local friends
21:48 < Bluestreak> we have enough rich white dudes already!
21:48 < jokeefe> aye on both points
21:49 < jokeefe> so no comments? srevilak, were the ones I sent useful?
21:50 < srevilak> srevilak: yes, piratecon survey form comments have
        been very helpful
21:50 < Bluestreak> I need to think longer about my answers... sorry...
21:50 < srevilak> should we decide on a window for accepting comments?
21:51 < srevilak> (ie, start when, end when)
21:51 < jokeefe> good to hear.  Would like to get a post up about it
        by Monday.  Sound reasonable?
21:51 < srevilak> jokeefe: I think so.
21:51 < srevilak> Will send a shout-out when the next batch of edits
        are in
21:51 < jokeefe> Two weeks window?
21:51 < jokeefe> thanks, srevilak
21:53 < jokeefe> Bluestreak, is two weeks enough time for people to
        submit survey results?
21:53 < srevilak> jokeefe: I think two weeks is reasonable
21:54 < Bluestreak> I....
21:54 < Bluestreak> I don't know!
21:55 < jokeefe> no worries I don't know either ;-)
21:56 < jokeefe> Next Cryptoparty?
21:57 < jokeefe> or is there too much to do the rest of the year.
        ok to put off deciding
21:59 < Bluestreak> Sorry not my best night.
21:59 < jokeefe> no worries.
21:59 < jokeefe> motion to adjourn?
22:00 < srevilak> second motion to adjourn
22:00 < jokeefe> all in favor?
22:01 < jokeefe> aye
22:01 < srevilak> aye
22:01 < jokeefe> srevilak, wlll you post the notes?
22:01 < srevilak> jokeefe: will do
22:01 < jokeefe> motion passes
22:01 < jokeefe> thank you