March 28th, 2017 IRC Meeting: Difference between revisions
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 84: | Line 84: | ||
Monday cryptoparty had a good turn out. | Monday cryptoparty had a good turn out. | ||
Piratecon schedule. We had lots of talk proposals. We found a way to get everyone in. We'll have seven 45-minutes slots, with a five minute break between each slot. Plus lightning talks. See [[PirateCon 2017 Topics]] for talk groupings. | |||
=== To Dos === | === To Dos === | ||
Piratecon code of conduct | |||
== Minutes == | == Minutes == | ||
<nowiki> | <nowiki> | ||
21:07 < jokeefe> agenda - | |||
https://masspirates.org/wiki/March_28th,_2017_IRC_Meeting | |||
21:07 < papegaai> Title: March 28th, 2017 IRC Meeting - Mass Pirate Wiki | |||
(at masspirates.org) | |||
21:08 < jokeefe> I tried to organize them into similar topics - | |||
https://masspirates.org/wiki/PirateCon_2017_Topics | |||
21:08 < papegaai> Title: PirateCon 2017 Topics - Mass Pirate Wiki | |||
(at masspirates.org) | |||
21:10 < jokeefe> ids | |||
21:10 < jokeefe> James O’Keefe, Somerville | |||
21:10 < srevilak> Steve Revilak, Arlington, MA | |||
21:13 < jokeefe> Review | |||
21:13 < jokeefe> Annoy Legislators for Freedom talk went well | |||
21:14 < jokeefe> Recorded it. Edited it. Uploading it to our youtube | |||
channel. Hopefully will be done tonight. | |||
21:15 < jokeefe> LibrePlanet | |||
21:16 < srevilak> We had a nice turnout for Sunday's cryptotable | |||
21:16 < srevilak> Good conversation about technology and social justice, | |||
and quite a few key signings | |||
21:17 < srevilak> I gave a lightning talk on Saturday, to pitch running | |||
for office. | |||
21:18 < srevilak> Also had an interesting conversation with a DoD lawyer | |||
about software procurement in the government sector | |||
21:18 < srevilak> (out) | |||
21:18 < jokeefe> oh? | |||
21:19 < srevilak> Yeah. DoD tries to promote the idea of buying | |||
off the shelf. In reality, any big project they do has a ton of | |||
customization work, and DoD may or may not wind up owning the rights to | |||
those customizations | |||
21:19 < srevilak> but the idea of free software is starting to take hold | |||
in DoD | |||
21:19 < jokeefe> cool | |||
21:19 < srevilak> http://code.mil/ | |||
21:19 < papegaai> Title: code.mil (at code.mil) | |||
21:20 < srevilak> To me, that's encouraging | |||
21:21 < srevilak> Conversation started because i was curious about the | |||
demarcation between completely off the shelf, and completely custom | |||
built projects | |||
21:22 < jokeefe> Interesting | |||
21:22 < jokeefe> the Monday cryptoparty had a good turn out of teachers | |||
and a good discussion. The Friday one should be even better. | |||
21:23 < srevilak> Great | |||
21:23 < jokeefe> Any Decisions/Endorsements? | |||
21:23 < srevilak> I think piratecon speakers might be the big decision | |||
21:23 < jokeefe> Projects - Conference | |||
21:23 < jokeefe> https://masspirates.org/wiki/PirateCon_2017_Topics | |||
21:23 < papegaai> Title: PirateCon 2017 Topics - Mass Pirate Wiki | |||
(at masspirates.org) | |||
21:24 < srevilak> One point of information. The person who submitted | |||
"The need for the voice of the people; The need for democracy" is thinking | |||
about running for mayor in Lowell, as a pirate | |||
21:25 < jokeefe> thanks for that update | |||
21:26 < jokeefe> I updated the topics page | |||
21:27 < WilliamOfHunts> Chris Foran - Roxbury | |||
21:27 < jokeefe> ahoy | |||
21:28 < jokeefe> We are reviewing the PirateCon talk proposals - | |||
https://masspirates.org/wiki/PirateCon_2017_Topics | |||
21:28 < papegaai> Title: PirateCon 2017 Topics - Mass Pirate Wiki | |||
(at masspirates.org) | |||
21:29 < jokeefe> The general schedule layout is | |||
https://masspirates.org/blog/conference/#schedule | |||
21:29 < papegaai> Title: PirateCon 2017 | Massachusetts Pirate Party | |||
(at masspirates.org) | |||
21:30 < srevilak> (minor edit. Alex Marthews was an additional speaker, | |||
rather than a topic) | |||
21:30 < srevilak> Although, I suppose alex would be a good topic of | |||
conversation :) | |||
21:30 < jokeefe> agreed | |||
21:31 < srevilak> For the sake of narrowing this down, I wouldn't mind | |||
opening with Running for office and closing with Breakout groups | |||
21:32 < WilliamOfHunts> Ranked Choice Voting =?= automatic runoff election | |||
21:32 < srevilak> WilliamOfHunts: that's one way to do it | |||
21:32 < WilliamOfHunts> Ya, we need that. | |||
21:33 < srevilak> The proposer is one of the people behind | |||
http://www.voterchoicema.org/ | |||
21:33 < papegaai> Title: Voter Choice MA (at www.voterchoicema.org) | |||
21:33 < jokeefe> So grouped this way, we have seven, but only space | |||
for six | |||
21:34 < jokeefe> We could merge the Organizing and Running for office | |||
talks | |||
21:35 < srevilak> I was actually thinking Ranked choice voting + running | |||
for office | |||
21:35 < srevilak> motivated by recollection that RCV was one of Aaron's | |||
main platforms | |||
21:35 < srevilak> wdyt? | |||
21:36 < jokeefe> could | |||
21:38 < srevilak> If we moved RCV to the opening panel and Piracy on | |||
Internet to lightning talk, I think we'd have an equal # of spots and | |||
panels, no? | |||
21:39 < srevilak> who was proposed speaker for FOIA nuts and bolts? | |||
21:39 < jokeefe> I already put RCV and Piracy into lightning talks | |||
21:39 < jokeefe> Maya and JPat of Muckrock | |||
21:39 < srevilak> ok | |||
21:39 * srevilak refreshes browser | |||
21:40 < jokeefe> We still have seven topics | |||
21:40 < srevilak> I was going to say, I kept counting seven | |||
21:41 < srevilak> How about this - move FOIA to fake news | |||
21:41 < srevilak> because primary source documents are the antithesis | |||
to fake news | |||
21:41 < jokeefe> I think FOIA needs its own time since it is more of a | |||
how to | |||
21:42 < srevilak> Then we still have seven | |||
21:44 < jokeefe> I think the Running for Office / Organizing are close | |||
enough to merge. | |||
21:44 < srevilak> Another alternative: cut lightning talks from 90 -> | |||
60 minutes | |||
21:44 < srevilak> make the remaining sections 45 minutes each | |||
21:44 < srevilak> that gives us enough room to accomodate 8 | |||
21:44 < jokeefe> Could | |||
21:46 < srevilak> Although, would like to give > 45 min for breakout | |||
sessions, so we can (hopefully) come up with a few pieces of policy | |||
21:47 < srevilak> At this point, is it safe to say we can accept all of | |||
the talk proposals, in one form or another? | |||
21:48 < srevilak> If so, I can get in touch with the proposers, and see | |||
if they have any scheduling constraints | |||
21:48 < jokeefe> I put a draft schedule up at the page | |||
21:49 < jokeefe> 45min with 1hr for lunch and lightning talks gives us | |||
8 45 minute sections | |||
21:50 < srevilak> Sounds good to me | |||
21:52 < jokeefe> Could do 45 min with 5 min break and have 7 45 minute | |||
sections | |||
21:52 < srevilak> jokeefe: I think that's a better idea. | |||
21:53 < srevilak> Plus, gives time for changeover | |||
21:53 < jokeefe> ok, lets go with it | |||
21:53 < srevilak> excellend | |||
21:53 < srevilak> excellent | |||
21:53 < srevilak> I will write to speakers tomorrow night, and ask about | |||
scheduling constraints | |||
21:53 < jokeefe> we can modify if anyone cancels or we need to change | |||
things further | |||
21:53 < srevilak> agreed | |||
21:53 < jokeefe> we can move RCV into the Campaigning section | |||
21:54 < jokeefe> then | |||
21:54 < srevilak> sounds good | |||
21:55 < jokeefe> Will email and see who can contact speakers | |||
21:55 < srevilak> jokeefe: I already volunteered to contact speakers :) | |||
21:55 < jokeefe> thanks | |||
21:56 < jokeefe> Will ask Aaron about Running for office people | |||
21:56 < srevilak> ok | |||
21:58 < jokeefe> shall we adjourn? | |||
21:58 < srevilak> motion to adjourn | |||
21:58 < jokeefe> 2nd | |||
21:58 < jokeefe> all in favor? | |||
21:58 < srevilak> will post transcript | |||
21:58 < srevilak> aye | |||
21:59 < jokeefe> thanks | |||
21:59 * srevilak adds to do. Should have a code of conduct for the | |||
conference | |||
22:00 < jokeefe> agreed | |||
</nowiki> | </nowiki> | ||
Latest revision as of 22:02, 28 March 2017
Review
Annoy Legislators for Freedom
LibrePlanet
Decisions/Endorsements
Projects
Conference
Fundraising
Campaign Workshops
Planks
Previous work in this area: https://github.com/masspirates/planks
Message board application
Local Surveillance Ordinances
Projects On Hold For the Moment
First two of these could be topics for future hackathons.
CCTV Camera Map
Looking at organizing a map-a-thon.
Together Boston Meshnet
MAAPL Fight Foreclosure Campaign
Upcoming Events
- 3/29, 6-9pm, Somerville Cryptoparty, The Sprouts, 339R Summer Street, Somerville
- 3/31, 6-8pm, Privacy at the Border workshop - for International Students, Lamont Forum Room, Lamont Library in Harvard Yard (the corner of Quincy & Harvard St), Cambridge, Facebook event
- 4/1, 2-4pm, Democracy/IT meeting, Arlington. Email info@masspirates.org for the location
- 4/22, March for Science, Boston
- 4/25, 5-8pm, Campaign Workshop, Holyoke Public Library Community Room, 250 Chestnut St, Holyoke
- 4/26, 6-9pm, Somerville Cryptoparty, The Sprouts, 339R Summer Street, Somerville
- 4/29, PirateCon (details forthcoming)
- 4/29-30, 9am-5:30pm, MassAlliance Grassroots Campaign Training, Western Massachusetts
- 5/5, 5-7pm, LGBT-focused Cryptoparty, Make Shift Boston, 549 Columbus Ave, Boston
- 5/6-7, 9am-5:30pm, MassAlliance Grassroots Campaign Training, Greater Boston
- 5/9, Massachusetts Pirate Party 7th Anniversary
- 5/14-21, Together Boston, Cambridge
- 5/17, Chelsea Manning's Release Date
- 5/20, 10am-4pm, March Against Monsanto
- 5/21, noon-6pm, Together Boston Cryptoparty, Together Boston space, 614 Massachusetts Ave. #203, Central Sq., Cambridge
- 5/31, 6-9pm, Somerville Cryptoparty, The Sprouts, 339R Summer Street, Somerville
- 6/3, 5-7pm, LGBT-focused Cryptoparty, Make Shift Boston, 549 Columbus Ave, Boston
- 6/10, Boston Pride Parade, Boston
- 6/21, Edward Snowden's Birthday
- 6/28, 6-9pm, Somerville Cryptoparty, The Sprouts, 339R Summer Street, Somerville
See: 2017 calendar
Participants
- srevilak (Steve Revilak, Arlington, MA)
- jokeefe (James O’Keefe, Somerville)
- WilliamOfHunts (Chris Foran - Roxbury)
Observers
- davidd
- igel
- jotaemei
- papegaai
- Techrev
Summary
Annoy legislators for freedom talk went well. Jamie recorded the talk and is uploading it to youtube.
Libreplanet. Nice turnout for Sunday Cryptotable. Steve pitched running for office during a Lightning talk on Saturday. Learned that DoD is starting to experiment with FOSS. See http://code.mil/
Monday cryptoparty had a good turn out.
Piratecon schedule. We had lots of talk proposals. We found a way to get everyone in. We'll have seven 45-minutes slots, with a five minute break between each slot. Plus lightning talks. See PirateCon 2017 Topics for talk groupings.
To Dos
Piratecon code of conduct
Minutes
21:07 < jokeefe> agenda -
https://masspirates.org/wiki/March_28th,_2017_IRC_Meeting
21:07 < papegaai> Title: March 28th, 2017 IRC Meeting - Mass Pirate Wiki
(at masspirates.org)
21:08 < jokeefe> I tried to organize them into similar topics -
https://masspirates.org/wiki/PirateCon_2017_Topics
21:08 < papegaai> Title: PirateCon 2017 Topics - Mass Pirate Wiki
(at masspirates.org)
21:10 < jokeefe> ids
21:10 < jokeefe> James O’Keefe, Somerville
21:10 < srevilak> Steve Revilak, Arlington, MA
21:13 < jokeefe> Review
21:13 < jokeefe> Annoy Legislators for Freedom talk went well
21:14 < jokeefe> Recorded it. Edited it. Uploading it to our youtube
channel. Hopefully will be done tonight.
21:15 < jokeefe> LibrePlanet
21:16 < srevilak> We had a nice turnout for Sunday's cryptotable
21:16 < srevilak> Good conversation about technology and social justice,
and quite a few key signings
21:17 < srevilak> I gave a lightning talk on Saturday, to pitch running
for office.
21:18 < srevilak> Also had an interesting conversation with a DoD lawyer
about software procurement in the government sector
21:18 < srevilak> (out)
21:18 < jokeefe> oh?
21:19 < srevilak> Yeah. DoD tries to promote the idea of buying
off the shelf. In reality, any big project they do has a ton of
customization work, and DoD may or may not wind up owning the rights to
those customizations
21:19 < srevilak> but the idea of free software is starting to take hold
in DoD
21:19 < jokeefe> cool
21:19 < srevilak> http://code.mil/
21:19 < papegaai> Title: code.mil (at code.mil)
21:20 < srevilak> To me, that's encouraging
21:21 < srevilak> Conversation started because i was curious about the
demarcation between completely off the shelf, and completely custom
built projects
21:22 < jokeefe> Interesting
21:22 < jokeefe> the Monday cryptoparty had a good turn out of teachers
and a good discussion. The Friday one should be even better.
21:23 < srevilak> Great
21:23 < jokeefe> Any Decisions/Endorsements?
21:23 < srevilak> I think piratecon speakers might be the big decision
21:23 < jokeefe> Projects - Conference
21:23 < jokeefe> https://masspirates.org/wiki/PirateCon_2017_Topics
21:23 < papegaai> Title: PirateCon 2017 Topics - Mass Pirate Wiki
(at masspirates.org)
21:24 < srevilak> One point of information. The person who submitted
"The need for the voice of the people; The need for democracy" is thinking
about running for mayor in Lowell, as a pirate
21:25 < jokeefe> thanks for that update
21:26 < jokeefe> I updated the topics page
21:27 < WilliamOfHunts> Chris Foran - Roxbury
21:27 < jokeefe> ahoy
21:28 < jokeefe> We are reviewing the PirateCon talk proposals -
https://masspirates.org/wiki/PirateCon_2017_Topics
21:28 < papegaai> Title: PirateCon 2017 Topics - Mass Pirate Wiki
(at masspirates.org)
21:29 < jokeefe> The general schedule layout is
https://masspirates.org/blog/conference/#schedule
21:29 < papegaai> Title: PirateCon 2017 | Massachusetts Pirate Party
(at masspirates.org)
21:30 < srevilak> (minor edit. Alex Marthews was an additional speaker,
rather than a topic)
21:30 < srevilak> Although, I suppose alex would be a good topic of
conversation :)
21:30 < jokeefe> agreed
21:31 < srevilak> For the sake of narrowing this down, I wouldn't mind
opening with Running for office and closing with Breakout groups
21:32 < WilliamOfHunts> Ranked Choice Voting =?= automatic runoff election
21:32 < srevilak> WilliamOfHunts: that's one way to do it
21:32 < WilliamOfHunts> Ya, we need that.
21:33 < srevilak> The proposer is one of the people behind
http://www.voterchoicema.org/
21:33 < papegaai> Title: Voter Choice MA (at www.voterchoicema.org)
21:33 < jokeefe> So grouped this way, we have seven, but only space
for six
21:34 < jokeefe> We could merge the Organizing and Running for office
talks
21:35 < srevilak> I was actually thinking Ranked choice voting + running
for office
21:35 < srevilak> motivated by recollection that RCV was one of Aaron's
main platforms
21:35 < srevilak> wdyt?
21:36 < jokeefe> could
21:38 < srevilak> If we moved RCV to the opening panel and Piracy on
Internet to lightning talk, I think we'd have an equal # of spots and
panels, no?
21:39 < srevilak> who was proposed speaker for FOIA nuts and bolts?
21:39 < jokeefe> I already put RCV and Piracy into lightning talks
21:39 < jokeefe> Maya and JPat of Muckrock
21:39 < srevilak> ok
21:39 * srevilak refreshes browser
21:40 < jokeefe> We still have seven topics
21:40 < srevilak> I was going to say, I kept counting seven
21:41 < srevilak> How about this - move FOIA to fake news
21:41 < srevilak> because primary source documents are the antithesis
to fake news
21:41 < jokeefe> I think FOIA needs its own time since it is more of a
how to
21:42 < srevilak> Then we still have seven
21:44 < jokeefe> I think the Running for Office / Organizing are close
enough to merge.
21:44 < srevilak> Another alternative: cut lightning talks from 90 ->
60 minutes
21:44 < srevilak> make the remaining sections 45 minutes each
21:44 < srevilak> that gives us enough room to accomodate 8
21:44 < jokeefe> Could
21:46 < srevilak> Although, would like to give > 45 min for breakout
sessions, so we can (hopefully) come up with a few pieces of policy
21:47 < srevilak> At this point, is it safe to say we can accept all of
the talk proposals, in one form or another?
21:48 < srevilak> If so, I can get in touch with the proposers, and see
if they have any scheduling constraints
21:48 < jokeefe> I put a draft schedule up at the page
21:49 < jokeefe> 45min with 1hr for lunch and lightning talks gives us
8 45 minute sections
21:50 < srevilak> Sounds good to me
21:52 < jokeefe> Could do 45 min with 5 min break and have 7 45 minute
sections
21:52 < srevilak> jokeefe: I think that's a better idea.
21:53 < srevilak> Plus, gives time for changeover
21:53 < jokeefe> ok, lets go with it
21:53 < srevilak> excellend
21:53 < srevilak> excellent
21:53 < srevilak> I will write to speakers tomorrow night, and ask about
scheduling constraints
21:53 < jokeefe> we can modify if anyone cancels or we need to change
things further
21:53 < srevilak> agreed
21:53 < jokeefe> we can move RCV into the Campaigning section
21:54 < jokeefe> then
21:54 < srevilak> sounds good
21:55 < jokeefe> Will email and see who can contact speakers
21:55 < srevilak> jokeefe: I already volunteered to contact speakers :)
21:55 < jokeefe> thanks
21:56 < jokeefe> Will ask Aaron about Running for office people
21:56 < srevilak> ok
21:58 < jokeefe> shall we adjourn?
21:58 < srevilak> motion to adjourn
21:58 < jokeefe> 2nd
21:58 < jokeefe> all in favor?
21:58 < srevilak> will post transcript
21:58 < srevilak> aye
21:59 < jokeefe> thanks
21:59 * srevilak adds to do. Should have a code of conduct for the
conference
22:00 < jokeefe> agreed