March 28th, 2017 IRC Meeting: Difference between revisions
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
=== To Dos === | === To Dos === | ||
Piratecon code of conduct | |||
== Minutes == | == Minutes == | ||
<nowiki> | <nowiki> | ||
21:07 < jokeefe> agenda - | |||
https://masspirates.org/wiki/March_28th,_2017_IRC_Meeting | |||
21:07 < papegaai> Title: March 28th, 2017 IRC Meeting - Mass Pirate Wiki | |||
(at masspirates.org) | |||
21:08 < jokeefe> I tried to organize them into similar topics - | |||
https://masspirates.org/wiki/PirateCon_2017_Topics | |||
21:08 < papegaai> Title: PirateCon 2017 Topics - Mass Pirate Wiki | |||
(at masspirates.org) | |||
21:10 < jokeefe> ids | |||
21:10 < jokeefe> James O’Keefe, Somerville | |||
21:10 < srevilak> Steve Revilak, Arlington, MA | |||
21:13 < jokeefe> Review | |||
21:13 < jokeefe> Annoy Legislators for Freedom talk went well | |||
21:14 < jokeefe> Recorded it. Edited it. Uploading it to our youtube | |||
channel. Hopefully will be done tonight. | |||
21:15 < jokeefe> LibrePlanet | |||
21:16 < srevilak> We had a nice turnout for Sunday's cryptotable | |||
21:16 < srevilak> Good conversation about technology and social justice, | |||
and quite a few key signings | |||
21:17 < srevilak> I gave a lightning talk on Saturday, to pitch running | |||
for office. | |||
21:18 < srevilak> Also had an interesting conversation with a DoD lawyer | |||
about software procurement in the government sector | |||
21:18 < srevilak> (out) | |||
21:18 < jokeefe> oh? | |||
21:19 < srevilak> Yeah. DoD tries to promote the idea of buying | |||
off the shelf. In reality, any big project they do has a ton of | |||
customization work, and DoD may or may not wind up owning the rights to | |||
those customizations | |||
21:19 < srevilak> but the idea of free software is starting to take hold | |||
in DoD | |||
21:19 < jokeefe> cool | |||
21:19 < srevilak> http://code.mil/ | |||
21:19 < papegaai> Title: code.mil (at code.mil) | |||
21:20 < srevilak> To me, that's encouraging | |||
21:21 < srevilak> Conversation started because i was curious about the | |||
demarcation between completely off the shelf, and completely custom | |||
built projects | |||
21:22 < jokeefe> Interesting | |||
21:22 < jokeefe> the Monday cryptoparty had a good turn out of teachers | |||
and a good discussion. The Friday one should be even better. | |||
21:23 < srevilak> Great | |||
21:23 < jokeefe> Any Decisions/Endorsements? | |||
21:23 < srevilak> I think piratecon speakers might be the big decision | |||
21:23 < jokeefe> Projects - Conference | |||
21:23 < jokeefe> https://masspirates.org/wiki/PirateCon_2017_Topics | |||
21:23 < papegaai> Title: PirateCon 2017 Topics - Mass Pirate Wiki | |||
(at masspirates.org) | |||
21:24 < srevilak> One point of information. The person who submitted | |||
"The need for the voice of the people; The need for democracy" is thinking | |||
about running for mayor in Lowell, as a pirate | |||
21:25 < jokeefe> thanks for that update | |||
21:26 < jokeefe> I updated the topics page | |||
21:27 < WilliamOfHunts> Chris Foran - Roxbury | |||
21:27 < jokeefe> ahoy | |||
21:28 < jokeefe> We are reviewing the PirateCon talk proposals - | |||
https://masspirates.org/wiki/PirateCon_2017_Topics | |||
21:28 < papegaai> Title: PirateCon 2017 Topics - Mass Pirate Wiki | |||
(at masspirates.org) | |||
21:29 < jokeefe> The general schedule layout is | |||
https://masspirates.org/blog/conference/#schedule | |||
21:29 < papegaai> Title: PirateCon 2017 | Massachusetts Pirate Party | |||
(at masspirates.org) | |||
21:30 < srevilak> (minor edit. Alex Marthews was an additional speaker, | |||
rather than a topic) | |||
21:30 < srevilak> Although, I suppose alex would be a good topic of | |||
conversation :) | |||
21:30 < jokeefe> agreed | |||
21:31 < srevilak> For the sake of narrowing this down, I wouldn't mind | |||
opening with Running for office and closing with Breakout groups | |||
21:32 < WilliamOfHunts> Ranked Choice Voting =?= automatic runoff election | |||
21:32 < srevilak> WilliamOfHunts: that's one way to do it | |||
21:32 < WilliamOfHunts> Ya, we need that. | |||
21:33 < srevilak> The proposer is one of the people behind | |||
http://www.voterchoicema.org/ | |||
21:33 < papegaai> Title: Voter Choice MA (at www.voterchoicema.org) | |||
21:33 < jokeefe> So grouped this way, we have seven, but only space | |||
for six | |||
21:34 < jokeefe> We could merge the Organizing and Running for office | |||
talks | |||
21:35 < srevilak> I was actually thinking Ranked choice voting + running | |||
for office | |||
21:35 < srevilak> motivated by recollection that RCV was one of Aaron's | |||
main platforms | |||
21:35 < srevilak> wdyt? | |||
21:36 < jokeefe> could | |||
21:38 < srevilak> If we moved RCV to the opening panel and Piracy on | |||
Internet to lightning talk, I think we'd have an equal # of spots and | |||
panels, no? | |||
21:39 < srevilak> who was proposed speaker for FOIA nuts and bolts? | |||
21:39 < jokeefe> I already put RCV and Piracy into lightning talks | |||
21:39 < jokeefe> Maya and JPat of Muckrock | |||
21:39 < srevilak> ok | |||
21:39 * srevilak refreshes browser | |||
21:40 < jokeefe> We still have seven topics | |||
21:40 < srevilak> I was going to say, I kept counting seven | |||
21:41 < srevilak> How about this - move FOIA to fake news | |||
21:41 < srevilak> because primary source documents are the antithesis | |||
to fake news | |||
21:41 < jokeefe> I think FOIA needs its own time since it is more of a | |||
how to | |||
21:42 < srevilak> Then we still have seven | |||
21:44 < jokeefe> I think the Running for Office / Organizing are close | |||
enough to merge. | |||
21:44 < srevilak> Another alternative: cut lightning talks from 90 -> | |||
60 minutes | |||
21:44 < srevilak> make the remaining sections 45 minutes each | |||
21:44 < srevilak> that gives us enough room to accomodate 8 | |||
21:44 < jokeefe> Could | |||
21:46 < srevilak> Although, would like to give > 45 min for breakout | |||
sessions, so we can (hopefully) come up with a few pieces of policy | |||
21:47 < srevilak> At this point, is it safe to say we can accept all of | |||
the talk proposals, in one form or another? | |||
21:48 < srevilak> If so, I can get in touch with the proposers, and see | |||
if they have any scheduling constraints | |||
21:48 < jokeefe> I put a draft schedule up at the page | |||
21:49 < jokeefe> 45min with 1hr for lunch and lightning talks gives us | |||
8 45 minute sections | |||
21:50 < srevilak> Sounds good to me | |||
21:52 < jokeefe> Could do 45 min with 5 min break and have 7 45 minute | |||
sections | |||
21:52 < srevilak> jokeefe: I think that's a better idea. | |||
21:53 < srevilak> Plus, gives time for changeover | |||
21:53 < jokeefe> ok, lets go with it | |||
21:53 < srevilak> excellend | |||
21:53 < srevilak> excellent | |||
21:53 < srevilak> I will write to speakers tomorrow night, and ask about | |||
scheduling constraints | |||
21:53 < jokeefe> we can modify if anyone cancels or we need to change | |||
things further | |||
21:53 < srevilak> agreed | |||
21:53 < jokeefe> we can move RCV into the Campaigning section | |||
21:54 < jokeefe> then | |||
21:54 < srevilak> sounds good | |||
21:55 < jokeefe> Will email and see who can contact speakers | |||
21:55 < srevilak> jokeefe: I already volunteered to contact speakers :) | |||
21:55 < jokeefe> thanks | |||
21:56 < jokeefe> Will ask Aaron about Running for office people | |||
21:56 < srevilak> ok | |||
21:58 < jokeefe> shall we adjourn? | |||
21:58 < srevilak> motion to adjourn | |||
21:58 < jokeefe> 2nd | |||
21:58 < jokeefe> all in favor? | |||
21:58 < srevilak> will post transcript | |||
21:58 < srevilak> aye | |||
21:59 < jokeefe> thanks | |||
21:59 * srevilak adds to do. Should have a code of conduct for the | |||
conference | |||
22:00 < jokeefe> agreed | |||
</nowiki> | </nowiki> |
Latest revision as of 21:02, 28 March 2017
Review
Annoy Legislators for Freedom
LibrePlanet
Decisions/Endorsements
Projects
Conference
Fundraising
Campaign Workshops
Planks
Previous work in this area: https://github.com/masspirates/planks
Message board application
Local Surveillance Ordinances
Projects On Hold For the Moment
First two of these could be topics for future hackathons.
CCTV Camera Map
Looking at organizing a map-a-thon.
Together Boston Meshnet
MAAPL Fight Foreclosure Campaign
Upcoming Events
- 3/29, 6-9pm, Somerville Cryptoparty, The Sprouts, 339R Summer Street, Somerville
- 3/31, 6-8pm, Privacy at the Border workshop - for International Students, Lamont Forum Room, Lamont Library in Harvard Yard (the corner of Quincy & Harvard St), Cambridge, Facebook event
- 4/1, 2-4pm, Democracy/IT meeting, Arlington. Email info@masspirates.org for the location
- 4/22, March for Science, Boston
- 4/25, 5-8pm, Campaign Workshop, Holyoke Public Library Community Room, 250 Chestnut St, Holyoke
- 4/26, 6-9pm, Somerville Cryptoparty, The Sprouts, 339R Summer Street, Somerville
- 4/29, PirateCon (details forthcoming)
- 4/29-30, 9am-5:30pm, MassAlliance Grassroots Campaign Training, Western Massachusetts
- 5/5, 5-7pm, LGBT-focused Cryptoparty, Make Shift Boston, 549 Columbus Ave, Boston
- 5/6-7, 9am-5:30pm, MassAlliance Grassroots Campaign Training, Greater Boston
- 5/9, Massachusetts Pirate Party 7th Anniversary
- 5/14-21, Together Boston, Cambridge
- 5/17, Chelsea Manning's Release Date
- 5/20, 10am-4pm, March Against Monsanto
- 5/21, noon-6pm, Together Boston Cryptoparty, Together Boston space, 614 Massachusetts Ave. #203, Central Sq., Cambridge
- 5/31, 6-9pm, Somerville Cryptoparty, The Sprouts, 339R Summer Street, Somerville
- 6/3, 5-7pm, LGBT-focused Cryptoparty, Make Shift Boston, 549 Columbus Ave, Boston
- 6/10, Boston Pride Parade, Boston
- 6/21, Edward Snowden's Birthday
- 6/28, 6-9pm, Somerville Cryptoparty, The Sprouts, 339R Summer Street, Somerville
See: 2017 calendar
Participants
- srevilak (Steve Revilak, Arlington, MA)
- jokeefe (James O’Keefe, Somerville)
- WilliamOfHunts (Chris Foran - Roxbury)
Observers
- davidd
- igel
- jotaemei
- papegaai
- Techrev
Summary
Annoy legislators for freedom talk went well. Jamie recorded the talk and is uploading it to youtube.
Libreplanet. Nice turnout for Sunday Cryptotable. Steve pitched running for office during a Lightning talk on Saturday. Learned that DoD is starting to experiment with FOSS. See http://code.mil/
Monday cryptoparty had a good turn out.
Piratecon schedule. We had lots of talk proposals. We found a way to get everyone in. We'll have seven 45-minutes slots, with a five minute break between each slot. Plus lightning talks. See PirateCon 2017 Topics for talk groupings.
To Dos
Piratecon code of conduct
Minutes
21:07 < jokeefe> agenda - https://masspirates.org/wiki/March_28th,_2017_IRC_Meeting 21:07 < papegaai> Title: March 28th, 2017 IRC Meeting - Mass Pirate Wiki (at masspirates.org) 21:08 < jokeefe> I tried to organize them into similar topics - https://masspirates.org/wiki/PirateCon_2017_Topics 21:08 < papegaai> Title: PirateCon 2017 Topics - Mass Pirate Wiki (at masspirates.org) 21:10 < jokeefe> ids 21:10 < jokeefe> James O’Keefe, Somerville 21:10 < srevilak> Steve Revilak, Arlington, MA 21:13 < jokeefe> Review 21:13 < jokeefe> Annoy Legislators for Freedom talk went well 21:14 < jokeefe> Recorded it. Edited it. Uploading it to our youtube channel. Hopefully will be done tonight. 21:15 < jokeefe> LibrePlanet 21:16 < srevilak> We had a nice turnout for Sunday's cryptotable 21:16 < srevilak> Good conversation about technology and social justice, and quite a few key signings 21:17 < srevilak> I gave a lightning talk on Saturday, to pitch running for office. 21:18 < srevilak> Also had an interesting conversation with a DoD lawyer about software procurement in the government sector 21:18 < srevilak> (out) 21:18 < jokeefe> oh? 21:19 < srevilak> Yeah. DoD tries to promote the idea of buying off the shelf. In reality, any big project they do has a ton of customization work, and DoD may or may not wind up owning the rights to those customizations 21:19 < srevilak> but the idea of free software is starting to take hold in DoD 21:19 < jokeefe> cool 21:19 < srevilak> http://code.mil/ 21:19 < papegaai> Title: code.mil (at code.mil) 21:20 < srevilak> To me, that's encouraging 21:21 < srevilak> Conversation started because i was curious about the demarcation between completely off the shelf, and completely custom built projects 21:22 < jokeefe> Interesting 21:22 < jokeefe> the Monday cryptoparty had a good turn out of teachers and a good discussion. The Friday one should be even better. 21:23 < srevilak> Great 21:23 < jokeefe> Any Decisions/Endorsements? 21:23 < srevilak> I think piratecon speakers might be the big decision 21:23 < jokeefe> Projects - Conference 21:23 < jokeefe> https://masspirates.org/wiki/PirateCon_2017_Topics 21:23 < papegaai> Title: PirateCon 2017 Topics - Mass Pirate Wiki (at masspirates.org) 21:24 < srevilak> One point of information. The person who submitted "The need for the voice of the people; The need for democracy" is thinking about running for mayor in Lowell, as a pirate 21:25 < jokeefe> thanks for that update 21:26 < jokeefe> I updated the topics page 21:27 < WilliamOfHunts> Chris Foran - Roxbury 21:27 < jokeefe> ahoy 21:28 < jokeefe> We are reviewing the PirateCon talk proposals - https://masspirates.org/wiki/PirateCon_2017_Topics 21:28 < papegaai> Title: PirateCon 2017 Topics - Mass Pirate Wiki (at masspirates.org) 21:29 < jokeefe> The general schedule layout is https://masspirates.org/blog/conference/#schedule 21:29 < papegaai> Title: PirateCon 2017 | Massachusetts Pirate Party (at masspirates.org) 21:30 < srevilak> (minor edit. Alex Marthews was an additional speaker, rather than a topic) 21:30 < srevilak> Although, I suppose alex would be a good topic of conversation :) 21:30 < jokeefe> agreed 21:31 < srevilak> For the sake of narrowing this down, I wouldn't mind opening with Running for office and closing with Breakout groups 21:32 < WilliamOfHunts> Ranked Choice Voting =?= automatic runoff election 21:32 < srevilak> WilliamOfHunts: that's one way to do it 21:32 < WilliamOfHunts> Ya, we need that. 21:33 < srevilak> The proposer is one of the people behind http://www.voterchoicema.org/ 21:33 < papegaai> Title: Voter Choice MA (at www.voterchoicema.org) 21:33 < jokeefe> So grouped this way, we have seven, but only space for six 21:34 < jokeefe> We could merge the Organizing and Running for office talks 21:35 < srevilak> I was actually thinking Ranked choice voting + running for office 21:35 < srevilak> motivated by recollection that RCV was one of Aaron's main platforms 21:35 < srevilak> wdyt? 21:36 < jokeefe> could 21:38 < srevilak> If we moved RCV to the opening panel and Piracy on Internet to lightning talk, I think we'd have an equal # of spots and panels, no? 21:39 < srevilak> who was proposed speaker for FOIA nuts and bolts? 21:39 < jokeefe> I already put RCV and Piracy into lightning talks 21:39 < jokeefe> Maya and JPat of Muckrock 21:39 < srevilak> ok 21:39 * srevilak refreshes browser 21:40 < jokeefe> We still have seven topics 21:40 < srevilak> I was going to say, I kept counting seven 21:41 < srevilak> How about this - move FOIA to fake news 21:41 < srevilak> because primary source documents are the antithesis to fake news 21:41 < jokeefe> I think FOIA needs its own time since it is more of a how to 21:42 < srevilak> Then we still have seven 21:44 < jokeefe> I think the Running for Office / Organizing are close enough to merge. 21:44 < srevilak> Another alternative: cut lightning talks from 90 -> 60 minutes 21:44 < srevilak> make the remaining sections 45 minutes each 21:44 < srevilak> that gives us enough room to accomodate 8 21:44 < jokeefe> Could 21:46 < srevilak> Although, would like to give > 45 min for breakout sessions, so we can (hopefully) come up with a few pieces of policy 21:47 < srevilak> At this point, is it safe to say we can accept all of the talk proposals, in one form or another? 21:48 < srevilak> If so, I can get in touch with the proposers, and see if they have any scheduling constraints 21:48 < jokeefe> I put a draft schedule up at the page 21:49 < jokeefe> 45min with 1hr for lunch and lightning talks gives us 8 45 minute sections 21:50 < srevilak> Sounds good to me 21:52 < jokeefe> Could do 45 min with 5 min break and have 7 45 minute sections 21:52 < srevilak> jokeefe: I think that's a better idea. 21:53 < srevilak> Plus, gives time for changeover 21:53 < jokeefe> ok, lets go with it 21:53 < srevilak> excellend 21:53 < srevilak> excellent 21:53 < srevilak> I will write to speakers tomorrow night, and ask about scheduling constraints 21:53 < jokeefe> we can modify if anyone cancels or we need to change things further 21:53 < srevilak> agreed 21:53 < jokeefe> we can move RCV into the Campaigning section 21:54 < jokeefe> then 21:54 < srevilak> sounds good 21:55 < jokeefe> Will email and see who can contact speakers 21:55 < srevilak> jokeefe: I already volunteered to contact speakers :) 21:55 < jokeefe> thanks 21:56 < jokeefe> Will ask Aaron about Running for office people 21:56 < srevilak> ok 21:58 < jokeefe> shall we adjourn? 21:58 < srevilak> motion to adjourn 21:58 < jokeefe> 2nd 21:58 < jokeefe> all in favor? 21:58 < srevilak> will post transcript 21:58 < srevilak> aye 21:59 < jokeefe> thanks 21:59 * srevilak adds to do. Should have a code of conduct for the conference 22:00 < jokeefe> agreed